ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Risk Management Observations From Litigation Involving Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

[Surgeon]

Hypothesis* Limited information exists on the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) litigation.
Design* A retrospective review of a public malpractice database was compared with previously published reviews of LC litigation by K. A. Kern, MD, and the Physician Insurers Association of America.
Setting* Private surgery practice.
Selection* The database was searched for cases containing the terms laparoscopy, bile, or gall between August 1, 1999, and August 31, 2004. Identified cases were further reviewed to select only the unique cases that concerned elective biliary surgery.
Main Outcome Measures* Surgical technique, injuries, and incidence of conversion to open procedures.
Results* In Kern's study, injuries triggering litigation involved the bile duct in 61%, bowel in 16%, vascular system in 9%, and miscellaneous events in 14%; in the present study, injuries involved the bile duct in 78%, bowel in 2%, vascular injury in 7%, and miscellaneous injuries in 13%. Missed injuries occurred in 86% in the present study and 83% of the Physician Insurers Association of America cases. Although 15% of cases in the present study were converted to open procedures, in 53% of these cases conversion was performed to repair an injury.
Conclusions* Despite residency training, injuries triggering litigation after LC remain largely unchanged. The nature of the bile duct injuries suggests that routine intraoperative cholangiography is unlikely to make LC safer. To minimize the risk of litigation after LC, it is recommended that the threshold for conversion to open procedures be lowered.

Read the full article at Archives of Surgery